2019, 11(4): 127-132. doi: 10.16670/j.cnki.cn11-5823/tu.2019.04.19
地铁车站火灾风险模糊层次综合评估模型与应用分析
1. | 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司, 西安 710043 |
2. | 广西公安消防总队,南宁 530000 |
3. | 南宁轨道交通集团有限责任公司, 南宁 530029 |
Comprehensive Fuzzy AHP Model for Fire Risk Prediction in Subway Station and Its Application Analysis
1. | China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group., Ltd., Xi′an 710043, China |
2. | Guangxi Public Security Fire Department, Nanning 530000, China |
3. | Nanning Rail Transit Co., Ltd., Nanning 530029, China |
引用本文: 彭磊, 徐学军, 杨磊. 地铁车站火灾风险模糊层次综合评估模型与应用分析[J]. 土木建筑工程信息技术, 2019, 11(4): 127-132. doi: 10.16670/j.cnki.cn11-5823/tu.2019.04.19
Citation: Peng Lei, Xu Xuejun, Yang lei. Comprehensive Fuzzy AHP Model for Fire Risk Prediction in Subway Station and Its Application Analysis[J]. Journal of Information Technologyin Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2019, 11(4): 127-132. doi: 10.16670/j.cnki.cn11-5823/tu.2019.04.19
摘要:地铁车站由于其结构的特殊性,一旦发生火灾,往往会造成重大的人员伤亡和财产损失。针对地铁车站火灾风险评价的研究具有重要意义。针对火灾风险等级各变量分析的基础上,构建了火灾风险等级评价指标体系和递阶层次评价结构,并建立抉择评判集以量化所提出的评价指标,对广西南宁地铁1号线工程实例进行火灾风险等级模糊层次综合评判。研究结果表明:通过采用模糊层次综合评判法对地铁车站火灾风险进行评价,能够对其进行多层次的分析研究,且建立的综合评价指标体系能够反映各类因子对地铁车站火灾风险的影响。
Abstract: Due to the particularity of its structure, once a fire occurs, the subway stations often cause significant casualties and property losses.It is of great significance to study the fire risk assessment of subway stations.Based on the variable analysis of the fire risk grade, this paper establishes an evaluation index system and a hierarchical evaluation structure for the fire risk grade, and also proposes the choice evaluation set to quantify the proposed evaluation index.The project of Metro Line 1 in Nanning, Guangxi Province is taken as an engineering case study to implement the Fuzzy Comprehensive AHP evaluation of fire risk level.The research results show that the fuzzy comprehensive AHP evaluation method is able to comprehensively evaluate the risk grade of station fire through the establishment of comprehensive evaluation index system, which is also able to comprehensively consider the factors that affect the risk grade of the subway station fire.
[1] |
ROH J S, RYOU H S, PARK W H, et al.CFD simulation and assessment of life safety in a subway train fire[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(4): 447-453.doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2008.12.003 |
[2] |
中华人民共和国建设部, GB50352-2005, 民用建筑设计通则[M].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2005-07-01. |
[3] |
吴江滨, 张顶立, 王梦恕.铁路运营隧道病害现状及检测评估[J].安全科学学报, 2003, 13(6) 49-52.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2003.06.014 |
[4] |
林懂明.铁路隧道病害的综合检测与治理[J].中国铁道科学, 2003, 24(1): 99-103.doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4632.2003.01.019 |
[5] |
BENKOUSSAS B, BOUHDJAR A, VAUQUElin O.Numerical security assessment in case of fire in underground transport spaces[J].Nature & Technology, 2015, 14(12): 45-59. |
[6] |
Rong Z D, Sun W.Experimental and numerical investigation on the namic tensile behavior of ultra-high performance cement based composites[J].Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 31: 168-173.doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.058 |
[7] |
尹玫, 朱合华, 闫治国.盾构隧道全寿命周期成本分析方法研究[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2010, 10(6): 1393-1397. |
[8] |
Fu Xiaoru, Li qin, Zhai Jianping, et al.The physical-chemical characterization of mechanically-treated CFBC fly ash, Cement and Concrete Composites, 2008, (30): 220-226. |
[9] |
彭磊, 徐学军, 杨磊.大型地铁车站火灾预警机制及疏散救援模式[J].土木建筑工程信息技术, 2018, 10(3): 104-107. |
[10] |
Dyer R, Forman E H.Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process[J].Decision Support Systems, 1992(8): 99-124. |
[11] |
张楚晨.基于多属性决策理论的软基处理方案的比选研究[D].长春工程学院, 2019. |
[12] |
沈聪, 邱铤, 曲波, 等.基于模糊层次分析法的集装化生活垃圾转运系统后评估[J].四川环境, 2018(4): 147-152.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3644.2018.04.026 |
[13] | |
[14] |
方燕燕, 徐福缘.基于主客观综合权衡的建筑工程招标评价研究[J].土木建筑工程信息技术, 2016, 8(2): 94-99. |
[15] |
睢羽.地铁火灾二次事故风险分析研究[D].北京: 北京交通大学, 2014. |
[16] |
Temuujin J, Williams RP, van Riessen A.Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature[J].Mater Process Technol, 2009, (209): 5276-5280. |
计量
- PDF下载量(20)
- 文章访问量(1915)
- HTML全文浏览量(1029)