2024, 16(3): 41-45. doi: 10.16670/j.cnki.cn11-5823/tu.2024.03.08
基于位置管理系统的施工进度计划应用研究
瑞森新建筑有限公司，济南 250000 |
Research on Application of Construction Schedule Based on Location Management System
Ruison Lean Construction Co., Ltd., Jinan 250000, China |
引用本文:
汤居庭, 谢洪栋, 王广兴, 彭国平. 基于位置管理系统的施工进度计划应用研究[J]. 土木建筑工程信息技术,
2024, 16(3): 41-45.
doi: 10.16670/j.cnki.cn11-5823/tu.2024.03.08
Citation:
Juting Tang, Hongdong Xie, Guangxing Wang, Guoping Peng. Research on Application of Construction Schedule Based on Location Management System[J]. Journal of Information Technologyin Civil Engineering and Architecture,
2024, 16(3): 41-45.
doi: 10.16670/j.cnki.cn11-5823/tu.2024.03.08
摘要:传统关键路径法（CPM）在连续生产流及其相应资源配置管理方面存在不足。基于位置的管理系统（LBMS）能够弥补此类缺点。本研究实际应用自主研发的基于位置管理工具对关键路径法计划进行分析，并优化生产计划。研究结果显示，LBMS可在不影响项目持续时间的情况下，建立连续工作流程、平衡生产速率、优化资源配置。优化后的LBMS计划要素较少，其流线图效果简洁直观，利于生产各方沟通。
Abstract: The traditional planning method, the Critical Path Method(CPM)is deficient in the management of continuous production flow and resource allocation. Location-based management system (LBMS) can compensate for such deficiencies. Based on actual project cases, this paper analyzed and improved CPM schedule by applying LBMS with the authors' independent development. The result of the study showed that LBMS could establish continuous workflows, balance production rate, optimize resources allocation without much interruptions or affecting project duration. Furthermore, LBMS schedules were optimized with fewer planning elements, hence its flowline graph had a concise and intuitive effect, facilitated communication among all parties.
| [1] |
Dallasega P, Marengo E, Revolti A. Strengths and shortcomings of methodologies for production planning and control of construction projects: A systematic literature review and future perspective[J]. Production Planning & Control, 2020, 32(4): 1–26. |
| [2] |
朱祥松. 基于CPM的资源约束项目进度安排与挣值分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2005. |
| [3] |
任斌, 王晓颖, 冯亦军. BIM技术在北京大兴国际机场东航维修机库中的应用[J]. 建筑科学, 2019, 35(11): 133-137. |
| [4] |
Benjaoran V, Tabyang W, Sooksil N. Precedence relationship options for the resource levelling problem using a genetic algorithm[J]. Construction management and economics, 2015, 33 (9): 711–723.doi: 10.1080/01446193.2015.1100317 |
| [5] |
Hegazy T, Menesi W. Critical path segments scheduling technique[J]. Journal of construction engineering and management, 2010, 136 (10): 1078–1085.doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000212 |
| [6] | |
| [7] |
Huber B, Reiser P. The marriage of CPM and lean construction[C]//11th International Group for Lean Construction Conference, Virginia Tech, Virginia, USA, 2003. |
| [8] |
Lucko G, Alves TCL, Angelim VL. Challenges and opportunities for productivity improvement studies in linear, repetitive, and location-based scheduling[J]. Construction management and economics, 2014, 32 (6): 575–594.doi: 10.1080/01446193.2013.845305 |
| [9] |
Seppänen O, Evinger J, Mouflard C. Effects of the location-based management system on production rates and productivity[J]. Construction management and economics, 2014, 32 (6): 608–624.doi: 10.1080/01446193.2013.853881 |
| [10] |
贾真. 信息化环境下基于位置的建设工程施工管理方法应用研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2016. |
| [11] | |
| [12] |
Anna Krawczy ń ska Piechna. A concept of an integrated construction planning system involving location-based scheduling technique[J]. The Technical Transactions civil engineering, 2014, 2-B: 209-216. |
| [13] |
Stradal O, Cacha J. Time space scheduling method[J]. Journal of the Construction Division, 1982, 108(3): 445-457.doi: 10.1061/JCCEAZ.0001056 |
计量
- PDF下载量(0)
- 文章访问量(42)
- HTML全文浏览量(20)
