Citation:
Jia Chen, Menglin Wang, Jingjing Li, Zhihuang Gong, Jiantao Liu. Application of the Canopy Simplification Model in Wind Environment Simulation. Journal of Information Technologyin Civil Engineering and Architecture,
2023, 15(1): 49-54.
doi: 10.16670/j.cnki.cn11-5823/tu.2023.01.09
2023, 15(1): 49-54. doi: 10.16670/j.cnki.cn11-5823/tu.2023.01.09
Application of the Canopy Simplification Model in Wind Environment Simulation
Beijing Glory PKPM Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200023, China |
In this paper, a new canopy simulation method is used for the analysis of the canopy drag. The comparation between the common and new canopy simulation method is made to obtained the different influence from their simulation results. Firstly, a brief description of the simplified method of the common and the new canopy simulation methods is given in this paper. Secondly, two simplified models are made by using the new canopy simulation method and then compared with a case made by the common canopy simulation method. After the analysis of the simulations, it is found that by using the new canopy simulation method, it is managed to set the real LAD distribution along the canopy height direction, and then a more reasonable wind field data can be obtained.
| [1] |
B Dalpé, Masson C. Numerical simulation of wind flow near a forest edge[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009, 97(5-6): 228-241.doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2009.06.008 |
| [2] |
Aliaksandr A, Stefan P, Romualda K, et al. Canopy Architecture and Yielding of Different Tomato Morphotypes Under Glasshouse Conditions[J]. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, 2009, 70(1): 49-58. |
| [3] |
Mochida A, Tabata Y, Iwata T, et al. Examining tree canopy models for CFD prediction of wind environment at pedestrian level[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(10-11): 1667-1677.doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.055 |
| [4] |
Molina-Aiz F D, Valera D L, A.J. álvarez, et al. A Wind Tunnel Study of Airflow through Horticultural Crops: Determination of the Drag Coefficient[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2006, 93(4): 447-457.doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.01.016 |
| [5] |
姚丹丹, 雷相东, 余黎, 等. 云冷杉针阔混交林叶面积指数的空间异质性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(1): 71–79. |
| [6] |
李亮, 李晓锋, 林波荣, 等. 用带源项k-ε两方程湍流模型模拟树冠流[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 46(6): 753–756.doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0054.2006.06.001 |
| [7] |
吴洋洋, 付海明. 树枝尺度的树冠气动特性风洞试验[J]. 东华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 45(4): 583–587, 595.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0444.2019.04.017 |
| [8] |
杨会, 付海明. 树冠流动阻力特性数值模拟与实验研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 47(12): 4291–4299. |
| [9] |
Gonçalves R, Linhares C, Yojo T. Drag coefficient in urban trees[J]. Trees, 2020: 1-13. |
| [10] |
Segersson D. A tutorial to urban wind flow using OpenFOAM[J]. Proceedings of CFD with OpenSource Software, 2017. |
| [11] |
Baker C J, Sterling M, Berry P. A generalised model of crop lodging[J]. Journal of theoretical biology, 2014, 363: 1-12.doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.07.032 |
| [12] |
Li C, Wang J, Hu G, et al. RANS simulation of horizontal homogeneous atmospheric boundary layer over rough terrains by an enriched canopy drag model[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 206: 104281. |
| [13] |
Fahmy M, El-Hady H, Mahdy M. LAI and Albedo measurements based methodology for numerical simulation of urban tree' s microclimate: A case study in Egypt[J]. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res, 2016, 7: 790-797. |
| [14] |
Hosoi F, Omasa K. Detecting seasonal change of broadleaved woody canopy leaf area density profile using 3D portable LIDAR imaging[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2009, 36(11): 998-1005. |
| [15] |
Gromke C, Blocken B, Janssen W, et al. CFD analysis of transpirational cooling by vegetation: Case study for specific meteorological conditions during a heat wave in Arnhem, Netherlands[J]. Building and environment, 2015, 83: 11-26. |
| [16] |
Miao H, Gopalan H, Raghavan V, et al. Computational Fluid Dynamics simulation of wind flow and wind force on trees in urban parks[C]//8th International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications. 2016. |
Metrics
- PDF Downloads(13)
- Abstract views(817)
- HTML views(709)
